American Seating Co.

106 N.L.R.B. 250 (1953)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

American Seating Co.

National Labor Relations Board
106 N.L.R.B. 250 (1953)

  • Written by Patricia Peters, JD

Facts

In July 1950, American Seating Co. entered into a three-year collective-bargaining contract with Local No. 135 of the UAW-CIO, the certified bargaining representative of American Seating’s production and maintenance employees. Almost two years later, the Pattern Makers’ Association of the AFL (the union) filed a petition with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) seeking to represent a unit of American Seating’s patternmakers, who were in the unit represented by the UAW-CIO. American Seating and the UAW-CIO argued that the three-year contract, which was set to expire in July 1953, barred the election of new representatives. In September 1952, the NLRB issued a decision to the contrary. The bases of the NLRB’s decision were that (1) the contract had already been effective for two years and (2) American Seating and the UAW-CIO had not shown that three-year contracts were customary in the seating industry. The patternmakers elected the union as their bargaining representative, and the NLRB certified the union as bargaining representative on October 6, 1952. Soon after, the union submitted a proposed collective-bargaining agreement to American Seating. American Seating refused to make an agreement with the union, contending that the UAW-CIO had been the patternmakers’ agent when the first contract was made and thus that the patternmakers were still bound by the contract that would expire in July 1953. The NLRB took up the issue for review to decide whether American Seating had violated §§ 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Wagner Act, which requires employers to bargain in good faith with bargaining representatives.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership