American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. FCC

449 F.2d 439 (1971)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. FCC

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
449 F.2d 439 (1971)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (AT&T) (plaintiff) offered Telpak service to government agencies, common carriers, right-of-way companies, and public utilities. The Telpak service provided these customers the ability to receive bulk communications services at a discount. Smaller entities could also combine their uses to qualify for discounted Telpak rates. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (defendant) revised its rules related to Telpak services several times, eventually initiating a ratemaking proceeding. During the proceeding, members of the FCC’s Common Carrier Bureau (the Bureau) participated in the investigation and hearing and then helped the FCC determine and draft its final decision requiring unlimited Telpak services. The FCC’s final decision made AT&T’s limited Telpak services, which were only available to certain customers, a violation of the Communications Act of 1934. AT&T appealed, arguing the FCC had violated the Communications Act of 1934 and due process by allowing members of the Bureau to participate in the ratemaking proceedings in both adversarial and judicial roles.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lumbard, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership