Americana Healthcare Center v. Randall
Supreme Court of South Dakota
513 N.W.2d 566 (1994)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Robert Randall (defendant) was the only child of Juanita Randall. When Robert’s father passed away, Juanita established an irrevocable trust and named Robert as the trustee. Juanita also gave Robert power of attorney over her checking account. At the time, Juanita was 92 years old, and Robert was an adult. Robert lived in Washington, D.C., while Juanita lived in South Dakota. Juanita was in an accident and needed full-time care. With Robert’s help, Juanita was admitted to a nursing home owned by Americana Healthcare Center (Americana) (plaintiff). Although Juanita had a house and mutual funds in the trust, she had otherwise limited income and was considered indigent. Americana sent bills for Juanita’s care to Robert, but Robert did not pay the bills. Juanita passed away while residing in Americana’s nursing home. Americana brought suit against Robert, seeking to recover for the unpaid bills. Americana based the suit on a South Dakota law that required adult children to assist in the financial support of their indigent, aged parents if the children had the financial ability to do so. Robert argued that the statute violated his rights to equal protection and due process. In terms of due process, Robert claimed that because Washington, D.C., did not have a similar law, the court could not apply the South Dakota law to Robert, a resident of Washington, D.C. The trial court ruled in Americana’s favor. Robert appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Amundson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.