AmerUs Life Insurance Co. v. Lait
Florida Supreme Court
2 So. 3d 203 (2009)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
AmerUs Life Insurance Company (AmerUs) (plaintiff) filed an action against Michael Lait (defendant). The trial court entered a final judgment in favor of AmerUs and ordered that Lait was to pay AmerUs’s attorney’s fees and costs. The trial court reserved jurisdiction to determine the exact amount of fees-and-costs owed. Eight months later, AmerUs filed a motion to determine the amount of fees-and-costs owed. Lait moved to dismiss, arguing that AmerUs’s motion was untimely because it was filed more than 30 days after entry of the final judgment, in violation of the statutory filing deadline for post-judgment fees-and-costs motions. The trial court dismissed AmerUs’s motion as untimely, effectively barring AmerUs from recovering fees-and-costs from Lait. AmerUs appealed. On appeal, the appellate court affirmed. However, because the appellate court’s decision conflicted with another appellate court’s decision in a similar case, the appellate court then certified a question to the Florida Supreme Court about whether the 30-day statutory filing deadline still applied if the trial court established the parties’ entitlement to attorney’s fees and costs in its final judgment but reserved jurisdiction to determine the exact amount of fees-and-costs owed at a later date.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Quince, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.