AMF Inc. v. Brunswick Corp.

621 F. Supp. 456 (1985)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

AMF Inc. v. Brunswick Corp.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
621 F. Supp. 456 (1985)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

AMF Inc. (plaintiff) and Brunswick Corporation (defendant) manufactured machinery used for bowling alleys. AMF and Brunswick previously filed claims against each other for false advertising. The parties ended litigation with a settlement agreement providing that any future advertising dispute would be submitted to the National Advertising Division (NAD) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus to determine whether the questionable advertisement was backed by evidence. Brunswick began advertising a new product, Armor Plate 3000, an alternative material for bowling lanes that Brunswick claimed was more durable than wooden lanes. AMF disputed the advertisement and invoked the settlement agreement. AMF informed Brunswick that Brunswick needed to send data supporting its advertisement to the NAD for review. Brunswick refused, and AMF filed suit in federal district court under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) to compel Brunswick to submit its data to the NAD for nonbinding arbitration.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Weinstein, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership