Amoah v. Mallah Management, L.L.C.
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
866 N.Y.S.2d 797, 57 A.D.3d 29 (2008)
- Written by Whitney Punzone, JD
Facts
In March 2003, Benjamin Amoah (plaintiff) came to the United States with a visa, which would expire in October 2003. The visa did not authorize Amoah to work. Amoah met Frank Boahen-Appiah, who allowed Amoah to use Boahen-Appiah’s driver’s license, Social Security card, and other documents to obtain work. Boahen-Appiah allowed Amoah to stay with him. In April 2003, Amoah began working for Mallah Management, L.L.C. (Mallah) (defendant) as a parking-garage attendant. In April 2005, Amoah was injured in the course of his employment. Mallah submitted a claim on behalf of Amoah for workers’-compensation benefits with its insurance carrier (defendant). Benefits were given under Boahen-Appiah’s name. Boahen-Appiah thereafter demanded that Amoah split the benefits with him and give him two-thirds of any recovery in a third-party action regarding the accident. When Amoah refused, Boahen-Appiah took back his documents and forced Amoah to leave. In September 2005, Amoah notified the employer’s insurance carrier of his real name. In November 2005, the carrier contested the payment of benefits with the Workers’ Compensation Board (the board). After hearings, a workers’-compensation-law judge (WCLJ) found that Amoah was not precluded from benefits by his use of fraudulent documents. The WCLJ awarded benefits after finding that Amoah had sustained a work-related injury. Mallah appealed for review by the board, which affirmed the WCLJ’s decision. Mallah and its carrier appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stein, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.