Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Amoco Production Co. v. First Baptist Church of Pyote

Texas Court of Civil Appeals
579 S.W.2d 280 (Tex. Civ. App. 1970)


Facts

First Baptist Church of Pyote and others (plaintiffs) leased gas rights to Amoco Production Co. (Amoco) (defendant). The leases provided that the royalty to the plaintiffs would be 1/8 of the gas sales on the properties. Amoco pooled its interests under these leases with the interests of other working interest owners in the area. The working interest owners sold the pooled gas to one of four companies: Lone Star Gas Company (Lone Star), Delhi Gas Pipeline Corporation (Delhi), Natural Gas Pipeline Company (Natural Gas), or Pioneer Natural Gas Company (Pioneer). The prices Natural Gas paid were regulated by federal law because Natural Gas transported the gas interstate. Lone Star and Delhi had contracts with the working interest owners that provided that the prices they paid would be re-established each year to reflect market prices. Pioneer’s prices were approximately 50 percent lower than those paid by the other three companies due to a preexisting long-term gas purchase contract. All gas attributable to the plaintiffs’ interests was sold to Pioneer. As a result, the plaintiffs were paid significantly less than other lessors for gas coming from the same well. The plaintiffs brought suit, asserting a breach of the implied duty to market. The trial court found in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding them the difference between what they were paid for the gas and what they would have been paid based on Lone Star’s purchase price for gas from the same well during the same time period. Amoco appealed.  

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Osborn, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.