From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
Amoco Production Co. v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
619 F.2d 1383 (1980)
In 1942, the Federal Farm Mortgage Corporation (FFMC) conveyed an interest in certain land to Hyrum and Florence Newton. The original 1942 deed was lost or destroyed, and the only surviving version of the deed was that recorded with the county. The recorded version showed that FFMC conveyed the entire interest to the Newtons with no reservation of mineral interests. Despite this version, the parties disputed whether this conveyance included the mineral interests. In 1957, FFMC conveyed to the United States government (defendant) the mineral interest it believed it held in the Newtons’ property. In 1960, the Newtons conveyed their interest in the subject property to a family corporation. In 1972, the family corporation, believing that it held the mineral rights in the land, conveyed such rights to Amoco Production Company (Amoco) (plaintiff). Amoco sued the United States to quiet title to the mineral rights in the land. At trial, Amoco introduced the recorded version of the deed, which showed that FFMC conveyed its entire interest to the Newtons, with no mineral reservation. The United States sought to present evidence that FFMC’s routine practice was to retain a mineral interest in lands it conveyed during the relevant period. The United States also presented other evidence, including a photocopy of a conformed copy of the deed found in Bureau of Land Management (BLM) files. Based on Federal Rule of Evidence 1005 (Rule 1005), the trial court excluded all the government’s evidence related to the contents of the 1942 deed. The court ruled that the availability of the recorded copy of the deed precluded all other evidence of the deed’s contents. The court then granted Amoco summary judgment. The United States appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (McKay, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 630,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.