Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Amphitheaters, Inc. v. Portland Meadows

Oregon Supreme Court
198 P.2d 847 (1948)


Facts

Two outdoor-recreation venues were built simultaneously on adjacent lots outside Portland’s city limits. Amphitheaters, Inc. (plaintiff) built a drive-in movie theater, and Portland Meadows (defendant) built a horse racetrack. Amphitheaters constructed high fences on each side of the movie screen and along an adjacent highway to keep out light from passing cars. Additionally, Amphitheaters built a shadowbox around the screen to block moonlight and starlight from interfering with the movies Amphitheaters projected. Portland Meadows constructed lights around its racetrack for nighttime races that, at several hundred feet away, cast light the equivalent of a full moon onto Amphitheaters’s screen. Amphitheaters sued Portland Meadows for trespass and nuisance. The trial court issued a directed verdict on both the trespass and nuisance theories in favor of Portland Meadows. Amphitheaters appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Brand, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.