Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Amy G. v. M.W.

Court of Appeal of California
142 Cal. App. 4th 1 (2006)


Facts

Kim (plaintiff) and Father (defendant) had an extramarital affair, while Father was married to Amy (defendant). As a result, Kim gave birth to a son, Nathan. Kim cared for Nathan exclusively during the first month of his life. When Nathan was one month old, Father presented Kim with a custody-and-adoption agreement. The agreement provided that Kim was relinquishing all rights to parent Nathan, that Father would retain full custody, and that Amy would adopt Nathan. Father and Kim both signed the agreement, and Father and Amy began raising Nathan. Kim later explained that she did not understand the agreement that she had signed. Thus, Kim filed a petition for custody. Father responded, requesting that the court join Amy in the action and enter a judgment establishing Amy as Nathan’s mother. The trial court denied Father’s motion to join Amy in the action. Amy filed a separate action against Father and Kim, seeking to have herself declared Nathan’s mother. Kim moved to quash Amy’s separate action. The trial court granted Kim’s motion and dismissed the suit. Amy and Father appealed to the Court of Appeal of California, which consolidated the appeal and Kim’s petition.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Klein, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.