Anderson v. Anderson
Mississippi Court of Appeals
54 So. 3d 850 (2010)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Donald Anderson (plaintiff) filed for divorce from his wife, Merlene (defendant), based on habitual cruel and inhuman treatment, or, alternatively, irreconcilable differences. Donald claimed that Merlene physically and verbally abused him as well as his two children from a previous marriage, threatened him, attempted to ruin his reputation as pastor of his church, and falsely accused him of having an affair. At trial, the children corroborated Donald’s claim that Merlene was physically and verbally abusive, but a guardian ad litem that the Mississippi Chancery Court appointed did not find sufficient evidence of child abuse. Merlene presented circumstantial evidence, including hotel rooms and emails, that Donald had an affair. The Mississippi Chancery Court found Merlene’s evidence unpersuasive and found that her accusations of adultery were unfounded. This, combined with Merlene’s other behavior led the Mississippi Chancery Court to find in favor of Donald and grant divorce based on habitual cruel and inhuman treatment. Merlene appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Griffis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.