Anderson v. Anderson

54 So. 3d 850 (2010)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Anderson v. Anderson

Mississippi Court of Appeals
54 So. 3d 850 (2010)

SC
Play video

Facts

Donald Anderson (plaintiff) filed for divorce from his wife, Merlene (defendant), based on habitual cruel and inhuman treatment, or, alternatively, irreconcilable differences. Donald claimed that Merlene physically and verbally abused him as well as his two children from a previous marriage, threatened him, attempted to ruin his reputation as pastor of his church, and falsely accused him of having an affair. At trial, the children corroborated Donald’s claim that Merlene was physically and verbally abusive, but a guardian ad litem that the Mississippi Chancery Court appointed did not find sufficient evidence of child abuse. Merlene presented circumstantial evidence, including hotel rooms and emails, that Donald had an affair. The Mississippi Chancery Court found Merlene’s evidence unpersuasive and found that her accusations of adultery were unfounded. This, combined with Merlene’s other behavior led the Mississippi Chancery Court to find in favor of Donald and grant divorce based on habitual cruel and inhuman treatment. Merlene appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Griffis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 803,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership