Court of Appeals of Washington
851 P.2d 744 (1993)
In 1988, M. Bruce Anderson, Gary D. LaChance, and M. Bruce Anderson, Inc. (Anderson) (plaintiffs), attempted to develop a plot of land that they owned in the City of Issaquah (Issaquah) (defendant). In order to develop land in the city, all plans must receive a land use certification that is approved by the Issaquah Development Commission. This commission is guided by statutory building design criteria that attempt to maintain the character of the city. Anderson brought his plans to develop the land in front of the commission, which was denied. The commission gave Anderson certain suggestions as to how to change the plans for resubmission. Anderson then submitted plans once again, which were denied due to aesthetic reasons. Anderson then brought this action against Issaquah claiming that Issaquah’s building regulations are vague.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 239,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.