Anderson v. Hale

2001 WL 641113

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
A
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Anderson v. Hale

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
2001 WL 641113

MP

Facts

Reverend Stephen Tracy Anderson (plaintiff) filed a § 1985(3) civil-rights claim against Matthew F. Hale and two others (defendants) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Anderson alleged that the defendants conspired to deprive him of his federally protected rights when they physically injured him. During discovery, Anderson issued subpoenas to several state bars for their investigative files relating to Hale’s applications for admission to those state bars. Citing Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 26(b)(1)’s general scope of discovery, Anderson claimed the files were discoverable because information about Hale’s character and fitness to practice law was relevant to Anderson’s claim and other information in the files could lead to the discovery of admissible evidence in Anderson’s civil rights action. Hale filed an emergency motion to stay Anderson’s subpoenas and argued that the information in those files was not relevant to Anderson’s lawsuit, nor was it reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ashman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 781,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Civil Procedure

Key Terms