Anderson v. Mergenhagen
Georgia Court of Appeals
642 S.E.2d 105 (2007)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Dick and Karyn Anderson divorced and did not get along well. Dick remarried, and Karyn began harassing Dick’s new wife, Maureen Anderson (plaintiff). After Karyn drove toward Maureen in a threatening manner four times, Maureen contacted the police, and an arrest warrant was issued for Karyn. Karyn then stopped harassing Maureen, but Karyn’s boyfriend, Paul Mergenhagen (defendant), began stalking and harassing Maureen. Mergenhagen repeatedly waited for Maureen to leave her gated community and then followed her around in his car, taking photographs, laughing at her, making obscene gestures, and making sure Maureen knew he was there. Mergenhagen also showed up in places where Maureen was and engaged in similar behavior. When Mergenhagen followed her, Maureen got upset and sometimes abandoned her plans because she was scared that he might do something to harm her or her young children as he followed them around. Maureen became constantly afraid that Mergenhagen would show up wherever she was. Maureen finally sued Mergenhagen, seeking a restraining order and damages for several torts, including an invasion-of-privacy claim. Believing that a physical intrusion was necessary to establish an invasion of privacy, the trial court dismissed Maureen’s invasion-of-privacy claim on the grounds that Mergenhagen had stalked Maureen only in public spaces and had not committed any physical intrusion of a private space. Maureen appealed the dismissal of her invasion-of-privacy claim.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Barnes, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.