Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.

328 U.S. 680 (1946)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.

United States Supreme Court
328 U.S. 680 (1946)

Facts

Employees at Mt. Clemens Pottery Company (the company) (defendant) had 14 minutes to clock in, walk to their respective stations, and conduct preparatory activities before official work began. It took roughly eight minutes for all employees to punch the clock, and anywhere from 30 seconds to eight minutes to walk across the factory floor to their respective stations. Employees then spent around three minutes putting on work attire and preparing their equipment. For purposes of compensation, the company rounded punch times within 15 minutes of the official start and end times to the hour so that an employee could be clocked in for up to 56 minutes of uncompensated time. Several employees and their union (the employees) (plaintiffs) brought an action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requesting damages for unpaid wages and overtime. A special master dismissed the action, finding that the employees failed to prove that they were required to work the amount of time alleged. The district court used a formula based on estimated walking and punching time to award judgment to the employees. The company appealed, and the court of appeals reinstated the findings of the special master. The Supreme Court accepted the case on writ of certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)

Dissent (Burton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership