Anderson v. State

692 N.W.2d 360 (2005)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Anderson v. State

Iowa Supreme Court
692 N.W.2d 360 (2005)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Kecia Anderson (plaintiff) was a student at the University of Northern Iowa, a public university of the State of Iowa (Iowa) (defendant). The campus library typically closed at midnight. Anderson was studying in the library one evening during a winter storm. A librarian told an assistant that the sidewalks were getting icy and she should contact Marilyn Mercado (defendant), the interim library dean, to find out whether to close the library early. Mercado decided to keep the library open until the usual closing time. Anderson left the library just before it closed, slipped, and fell on the ice. Anderson sued Mercado and Iowa for her injuries, alleging that Mercado and Iowa were negligent in failing to close the library early. At trial, it was established that Mercado tried to ascertain how dangerous the conditions were and how many employees and students were in the library. Mercado factored into her decision the number of people in the library; the library’s written policy to continue normal hours of operation during severe weather and allow faculty, staff, and students to make their own decisions about travel safety; and the other librarian’s tendency to exaggerate. The trial court granted Mercado and Iowa’s motion for a directed verdict, ruling that the decision not to close the library was protected by discretionary-function immunity. Anderson appealed. The court of appeals held that the decision to keep the library open was not policy driven and therefore was not subject to discretionary-function immunity. The state supreme court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wiggins, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership