From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Andrews v. Drew Municipal Separate School District
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
507 F.2d 611 (1975)
In 1972, the superintendent of the Drew Municipal Separate School District (district) (defendant) implemented a policy that disqualified parents of an illegitimate child from employment within the school system. The superintendent adopted the policy in response to learning that some of the teacher aides had illegitimate children. The purpose of the policy was to promote morality, ensure teachers modeled moral behavior, and prevent student pregnancy. The coordinator of elementary instruction for the district was tasked with investigating current employees and applicants to determine whether the individual was in violation of the policy. Katie Mae Andrews (plaintiff), aware of the policy, did not indicate she was the mother of an illegitimate child when applying for a job. However, after the coordinator investigated, Andrews was informed that she would not be considered for the position due to the policy. Lestine Rogers (plaintiff), also a mother of an illegitimate child, was already employed as a teacher aide prior to the policy. The coordinator informed Rogers that the district would not rehire her the following year because of the new policy. Andrews and Rogers filed suit against the district on the ground that the policy violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The district court found the policy violative of the Equal Protection Clause. The district appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Simpson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 607,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.