Andrews v. People

800 P.2d 607 (1990)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Andrews v. People

Colorado Supreme Court
800 P.2d 607 (1990)

Facts

Andrews and others (the protestors) (defendants) attempted to block the entrance to the Rocky Flats federal nuclear-weapons facility in Colorado. The protestors hoped to stop the manufacture of nuclear-weapon parts inside the plant and to eventually force the closure of the facility. The protestors obstructed traffic and disobeyed state police officers who ordered them to move. The protestors were arrested and charged with obstruction of a roadway and disobeying the request of a peace officer. At trial the protestors pleaded not guilty and served notice that they intended to invoke the choice-of-evils defense. The choice-of-evils defense was a statutorily created defense that could only be invoked if the defendant produced an offer of proof supporting the statutory elements of the defense. The trial court ruled that the protestors had failed to sufficiently do so and therefore refused to allow the protestors to invoke the choice-of-evils defense before the jury. The protestors were convicted, sentenced to community service and small fines, and appealed. The appellate court agreed that the protestors had failed to lay the required foundation for a choice-of-evils defense. The Colorado Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Erickson, J.)

Dissent (Quinn, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership