AngioScore, Inc. v. TriReme Medical, Inc.

2015 WL 4040388 (2015)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

AngioScore, Inc. v. TriReme Medical, Inc.

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
2015 WL 4040388 (2015)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Eitan Konstantino (defendant) invented the AngioSculpt, an angioplasty catheter. In 2003, Konstantino cofounded AngioScore, Inc. (plaintiff) to bring the AngioSculpt to market. In 2005, Tom Trotter replaced Konstantino as CEO. Konstantino transitioned to a different executive role, but he was unhappy with his new circumstances. Konstantino wanted to leave AngioScore to work full-time at another medical-device company he had founded, TriReme Medical, Inc. Konstantino’s employment with AngioScore ended in 2007. Konstantino remained on the board of directors and participated in board meetings until February 2010, when he was asked to resign. At this time, AngioScore was a strong company with about $15 million in cash on hand. In late 2009, Konstantino had begun developing a product, Chocolate, intended to compete with AngioSculpt. Chocolate used the same materials as AngioSculpt. Chocolate was to be priced exactly $25 below the list price for AngioSculpt and was intended for the same customers. During Chocolate’s development, Konstantino was still a member of AngioScore’s board and privy to confidential information. Eventually, Konstantino told Trotter that TriReme was considering developing a specialty balloon catheter, which was a lie. Trotter cut off the discussion and reported Konstantino’s comments to AngioScore’s board. The board determined Konstantino had a conflict of interest and requested his resignation, which Konstantino gave while denying development of any competing product. In spring of 2014, AngioScore learned of the competing product by Konstantino. AngioScore filed a claim for breach of fiduciary duty in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rogers, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 791,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership