Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. Case (United Kingdom v. Iran)

1952 I.C.J. 93 (1952)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. Case (United Kingdom v. Iran)

United Nations International Court of Justice
1952 I.C.J. 93 (1952)

Facts

The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AI) was incorporated in the United Kingdom (UK) (plaintiff). In 1933, AI entered a concession agreement with Iran (defendant) in which Iran granted AI the exclusive 60-year right to mine oil in Iran in exchange for money provided by the UK government. In 1953, Iran passed a law to nationalize its oil industry and establish a state-owned oil company. AI objected and sought to arbitrate pursuant to the concession agreement’s arbitration clause, but Iran refused to arbitrate. The UK government sued Iran in the International Court of Justice (ICJ), seeking damages and lost profits. However, Iran asserted that the court lacked jurisdiction because Iran hadn’t explicitly consented to its jurisdiction. The UK government argued that Iran had consented to the court’s jurisdiction because Iran had previously entered into a treaty with the UK, agreeing to treat UK citizens according to international laws.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Holmes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 833,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership