Anicet v. Gant

580 So. 2d 273 (1991)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Anicet v. Gant

Florida District Court of Appeal
580 So. 2d 273 (1991)

Facts

Edgar Anicet (defendant) was a violently insane 23-year-old who suffered mental illness and hospitalizations throughout his life. Anicet was confined to a mental hospital in Florida in 1986, where he continued to manifest an inability to refrain from violent acts, including throwing objects such as rocks and chairs at others. Partially for this reason, Anicet was confined on a ward for patients who presented the greatest danger. One day, Preston Gant (plaintiff), an attendant at the mental hospital, witnessed Anicet hurl a chair at another patient. Gant intervened. As Gant walked away, Anicet attempted to hit Gant by throwing a heavy ashtray at his head. Gant injured himself while twisting to avoid being struck. Workers’ compensation covered Gant’s economic loss. In addition, Gant sued Anicet for the intentional torts of assault and battery. Both Gant and Anicet moved for summary judgment on Anicet’s liability. At trial, a judge granted Gant’s motion and denied Anicet’s motion. After a jury determined Gant’s damages award, a final judgment was entered. Anicet appealed the final judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Schwartz, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership