Animal Legal Defense Fund v. United States Department of Agriculture
United States District Court for the Central District of California
223 F. Supp. 3d 1008 (2016)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) within the United States Department of Agriculture (department) (defendant) issued a regulation under the Poultry Products Inspection Act (inspection act) that livers of force-fed poultry could be used for human consumption despite the livers being affected by a condition called hepatic lipidosis due to excess fat. The FSIS had previously issued a regulation under the inspection act that the livers of birds affected by hepatic lipidosis due to natural disease could not be used for human consumption. The FSIS provided the rationale that the diseases causing hepatic lipidosis often resulted in other issues making the liver unfit for human consumption. The FSIS also based its decision on the fact that a study attempting to link human consumption of foie gras to secondary amyloidosis was insufficient. The FSIS alleged that the study was insufficient because it used mice, which were more susceptible to secondary amyloidosis. The Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) sued the department on the ground that the FSIS’s rationale for allowing the consumption of livers affected by hepatic lipidosis due to force feeding was nonsensical and irrational and that the regulation was counter to scientific evidence.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wright, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.