Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
A

Ansoumana v. Gristede's Operating Corp.

201 F.R.D. 81 (2001)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ansoumana v. Gristede’s Operating Corp.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
201 F.R.D. 81 (2001)

Facts

Faty Ansoumana and others (delivery workers) (plaintiffs) worked as delivery drivers for supermarket and drugstore chains (chains) (defendants) in New York City. The delivery workers worked between 60 and 84 hours per week and were paid only $1 to $2 per hour without overtime. The chains considered the delivery workers to be independent contractors, not employees. The delivery workers sued the chains for unpaid wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the New York Minimum Wage Act (NYMWA). Approximately 350 delivery workers filed consents in order to become parties to a collective action pursuant to § 216(b) of the FLSA. The delivery workers also filed a motion for class certification pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 in order to pursue their NYMWA claims as a group.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hellerstein, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Employment Law

Key Terms