Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
A

Antoine M. v. Chester Upland School District

420 F. Supp. 2d 396 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Antoine M. v. Chester Upland School District

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
420 F. Supp. 2d 396 (2006)

CS

Facts

The Chester Upland School District (the district) (defendant) determined that Antoine M. was not eligible to receive special-education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Antoine’s parent Samuel M. (plaintiff) sued the district. After the administrative-appeal process upheld the district’s decision, Samuel appealed in federal district court. Samuel filed a motion to be allowed to present new testimony from four additional witnesses who had not testified during the administrative-appeal process. Samuel claimed that he had not introduced these witnesses before either because their testimony fell outside a limitations period imposed by the initial-hearing officer or because the burden of proof to present such testimony rested on the district. The district opposed the introduction of any new evidence beyond that contained in the administrative record.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Robreno, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Disability Law

Key Terms