Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Any Kind Checks Cashed, Inc. v. Talcott

District Court of Appeal of Florida
830 So.2d 160 (2002)


Facts

D.J. Rivera fraudulently induced John G. Talcott Jr. (defendant) to send Rivera a check for $10,000 made out to Salvatore Guarino (defendant). The following day, Rivera told Talcott that the $10,000 was unnecessary and requested that Talcott instead send $5,700. Talcott stopped payment on the $10,000 check and sent Rivera a check for $5,700 made out to Guarino. Guarino brought the $10,000 check to Any Kind Checks Cashed, Inc. (Any Kind) (plaintiff) to be cashed. Guarino told Any Kind’s manager, Nancy Michael, that Guarino was a broker and that the check was intended as an investment. Michael tried but was unable to contact Talcott by phone. Michael cashed the check and deducted a 5 percent fee. Guarino returned to Any Kind to cash the $5,700 check. Michael instructed the teller not to cash the check until Michael obtained Talcott’s approval. Talcott approved, by phone, cashing the $5,700 check, but there was no discussion of the $10,000 check. Any Kind cashed the $5,700 check and deducted a 3 percent fee. Talcott then stopped payment on the $5,700 check. Any Kind sued Guarino and Talcott, claiming that Any Kind was a holder in due course. At trial, no evidence was offered concerning the general practices of the check-cashing industry. The trial court entered judgment in favor of Any Kind for the $5,700 check but held that Any Kind was not a holder in due course in relation to the $10,000 check, because the circumstances should have put Any Kind on notice of defenses or claims against the check. Any Kind appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Gross, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.