Apgar v. Lederle Laboratories

588 A.2d 380 (1991)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Apgar v. Lederle Laboratories

New Jersey Supreme Court
588 A.2d 380 (1991)

KL

Facts

Kelly Ann Apgar (plaintiff) was born in August 1961. As a child, Apgar was administered tetracycline antibiotics that resulted in permanent discoloration of her teeth. Apgar’s dentist told her when she was in elementary and middle school that the discoloration was due to tetracycline antibiotic use. In November 1985, when Apgar was 24 years old, Apgar read an article in the newspaper about a successful lawsuit in a tooth-discoloration case. That year, Apgar consulted with an attorney about filing suit. The following year, Apgar obtained her medical records showing that she was prescribed a tetracycline antibiotic produced by Lederle Laboratories (Lederle) (defendant), as well as other antibiotics produced by other companies. In March 1988, when Apgar was 26 years old, she sued Lederle and other drug companies (collectively, the drug companies) (defendants). The drug companies filed a motion for summary judgment, asserting a statute-of-limitations defense. The trial court denied the drug companies’ motion. The drug companies sought leave to appeal, which the appellate court denied. The New Jersey Supreme Court granted leave to appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership