Appeal of Eno (New Hampshire Department of Employment Security)
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
495 A.2d 1277 (1985)
- Written by Susie Cowen, JD
Facts
After Ms. Eno (plaintiff) was laid off from her job with the New England Telephone and Telegraph Company, she applied for unemployment compensation benefits. An employee of the New Hampshire Department of Employment Security (department) took Eno’s application, although she was not authorized to approve it. The employee advised Eno to reapply for benefits each week pending a determination of her eligibility. On her second visit to the department, Eno received a pamphlet that explained, among other things, that to remain eligible for unemployment compensation she must be available for and seeking permanent employment. Each week when Eno visited the department to file a new application, she was asked whether she was seeking work. Eno replied that she was, and did not receive further questioning or advice on the subject. Ultimately, the department determined that Eno was ineligible for unemployment compensation because she had made insufficient efforts to obtain work while her application was pending. The department’s appeal tribunal sustained the denial of benefits, and Eno appealed to the state supreme court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.