Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

35 F.3d 1435 (1994)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
35 F.3d 1435 (1994)

SH

Facts

Apple Computer, Inc. (plaintiff), creator of the Macintosh computer, licensed certain components of its Macintosh operating system to Microsoft Corp. (defendant), creator of the Windows operating system, for its development of Windows 1.0. In the 2.03 and 3.0 version of Windows, Microsoft included many more elements of the Macintosh operating system. Apple filed suit for infringement because the license agreement was solely for the development of Windows 1.0. In its defense, Microsoft challenged the copyrightability of the individual elements of the Macintosh operating system. Apple in turn argued that the individual elements were all protected by its claim of copyright in Macintosh’s overall desktop graphical interface. The district court concluded that any infringement of Apple’s operating system as a whole would require virtual identity. The district court then granted Microsoft’s motion for summary judgment under the virtual-identity standard. Apple appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rymer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership