Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Application of Doughboy Industries, Inc. to Stay Arbitration

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York
233 N.Y.S.2d 488 (1962)


Facts

Doughboy Industries, Inc. (Doughboy) (defendant), a buyer, had done business with Pantasote Company (Pantasote) (plaintiff), a seller, twice before the parties entered into an agreement. The transaction at issue began with Doughboy mailing two purchase orders to Pantasote. Pantasote called Doughboy to accept the purchase orders, and shipped the first part of the order the same day. A few days later, Doughboy received acknowledgements from Pantasote, which had used its own acknowledgement forms rather than the forms that Doughboy had provided. Doughboy’s purchase-order forms stated that purchase-order terms could only be altered in a writing signed by Doughboy. The acknowledgement form that Pantasote sent, however, stated that Doughboy would be subject to the terms of the acknowledgement form unless Doughboy objected to the terms within a specific timeframe. Pantasote’s acknowledgement form also contained a general arbitration clause that was not contained in Doughboy’s form. The parties did not object to each other’s forms at the time. When Doughboy later tried to change part of the orders, Pantasote objected and filed suit. Pantasote argued that the general arbitration clause in the acknowledgment form required Doughboy to arbitrate the dispute in New York, whereas Doughboy argued that it had not agreed to the arbitration and that Pantasote would have to litigate, most likely in Doughboy’s home state of Wisconsin. Accordingly, Doughboy moved to stay arbitration. The trial court denied the motion, and Doughboy appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Breitel, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.