Arab Monetary Fund v. Hashim and Others
United Kingdom House of Lords
[1991] UKHL J0221-1 (1991)
- Written by Curtis Parvin, JD
Facts
Twenty Arab states and Palestine jointly established the Arab Monetary Fund (AMF) (plaintiff) through the Arab Monetary Fund Agreement (the agreement) to develop Arab economies. The agreement provided that the AMF would have juridical personality, giving it the right to contract, acquire and dispose of property, sue, and be sued. The AMF headquarters was located in Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The UAE formally ratified the agreement and recognized the AMF. The AMF appointed Jawad Hashim (defendant) as its director-general. During his tenure, Hashim embezzled $50 million from the AMF, and the AMF sued Hashim and his family members in the United Kingdom (UK) to recover the money. Hashim moved to strike the complaint, contending that the AMF lacked the capacity to sue. The trial court denied the motion, but the court of appeal reversed the trial court’s decision and dismissed the AMF’s claim. The AMF appealed to the House of Lords.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Templeman, J.)
Dissent (Lowry, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.