From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Arakaki v. Cayetano
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
324 F.3d 1078 (2003)
Arakaki (plaintiff) filed an action against the State of Hawaii and various state agencies (the state) (defendants), challenging the constitutionality of certain exclusive benefits given to Hawaiians and native Hawaiians and arguing that the benefits violated the Equal Protection Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Josiah Hoohuli filed a motion to intervene, citing interests to ensure continued receipt of benefits and to limit the class of eligible beneficiaries to only native Hawaiians, at the exclusion of the broader Hawaiian class. The district court dismissed Hoohuli’s motion to intervene. Hoohuli appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hug, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 517,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.