United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
585 F.3d 559 (2009)
Maher Arar (plaintiff) is a dual citizen of Syria and Canada. While changing planes in New York, Arar was detained, based on a warning from Canadian authorities that he was a member of al Qaeda. Arar was intensely questioned about his relationship with suspected terrorists by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), as well as the Immigration and Nationalization Service (INS). On October 1, 2002, INS initiated removal proceedings against Arar, notifying him that he could not be admitted to the United States, because he belonged to a terrorist organization. On October 8, Arar learned that the INS had ordered his removal to Syria and barred him from reentering the United States for five years. Arar was flown to Jordan, then handed over to Syrian officials. Arar was in Syria for a year, where he was interrogated and brutally beaten. On October 5, 2003, Arar was released to the custody of the Canadian embassy and flown to Canada. Arar brought a Bivens suit against the Attorney General of the United States, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of the FBI (defendants), alleging the defendants’ actions violated Arar’s Fifth Amendment due process rights. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The district court dismissed the complaint, and Arar appealed. A three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Arar’s Bivens claims. The court then voted to rehear the appeal en banc.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Jacobs, C.J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Sack, J.)
Dissent (Calabresi, J.)
Dissent (Pooler, J.)
Dissent (Parker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.