Arbaugh v. Board of Education, County of Pendleton
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
214 W. Va. 677, 591 S.E.2d 235 (2003)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Tony Arbaugh (plaintiff) was a student at a West Virginia public school within the Pendleton County school district. Arbaugh alleged that he was sexually abused by a teacher at his school for four years but never reported the abuse to school officials. That same teacher was later convicted of sexually abusing 20 different students at Arbaugh’s school. The school never reported the teacher’s sexual abuse of the students to either children’s services or to the police. The teacher’s pattern of abuse was discovered without input from the school. After the teacher’s criminal conviction, Arbaugh sued the Pendleton County Board of Education (Board) (defendant) in federal district court for failing to report that the teacher was sexually abusing students. Arbaugh alleged that the Board’s failure to report was the proximate cause of that teacher being in a position to sexually abuse Arbaugh. Arbaugh conceded that neither the Board nor the school knew he was being sexually abused by the teacher. The Board was never criminally charged for failing to report suspected abuse. The Board moved to dismiss, arguing that there was no private civil cause of action under West Virginia’s mandatory reporting statute for failing to report child abuse. The federal district court certified a question to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals about whether West Virginia’s mandatory reporting statute implied a civil cause of action for failure to report reasonably suspected child sexual abuse.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Albright, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.