Arbitration between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the French Republic on the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf
United Nations International Court of Justice
18 I.L.M. 397 (1979)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
The United Kingdom of Great Britain (plaintiff) and the French Republic (defendant) disputed where the boundary lines must be drawn in the waters of the English Channel between the two states. The matter was complicated because the Channel Islands, a British territory, lie significantly closer to the French coastline, beyond the median point of the two states’ mainlands. Great Britain argued that the Channel Islands must serve as the coastline from which to draw its median point. France disagreed. The two states brought the issue to the United Nations International Court of Justice for arbitration.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.