Arcangel v. Huntington Atlantic Hotels, LLC

2018 WL 5885517 (2018)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Arcangel v. Huntington Atlantic Hotels, LLC

United States District Court for the District of Maryland
2018 WL 5885517 (2018)

Facts

Gilbert Arcangel (plaintiff) and Marygrace Arcangel (plaintiff), guests at a Marriott hotel owned by Huntington Atlantic Hotels, LLC (Huntington) (defendant), were allegedly bitten by bedbugs. The Arcangels told the hotel, which had pest-control company Ecolab, Inc. (defendant) exterminate the bedbugs, but Ecolab allegedly failed to properly perform its duties. The Arcangels sued Huntington and Ecolab. In Count I of their complaint, the Arcangels asserted a state-law negligence claim against Huntington for putting them in an infested room. In Count II, the Arcangels claimed that Huntington had violated the Maryland Consumer Protection Act (MCPA) by impliedly representing that the room was fit to occupy. In Count III, the Arcangels asserted a negligence claim against Ecolab for failing to properly inspect their room and exterminate the bedbugs. The Arcangels sought $75,000 in damages for Count I and $75,000 for Count II. Huntington and Ecolab removed the case to federal court, arguing that the amount-in-controversy requirement for removal to federal court had been met because Arcangels sought a total of $150,000 in damages against Huntington. The Arcangels moved to remand, and the district court considered the motion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Xinis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership