Archawski v. Hanioti
United States Supreme Court
350 U.S. 532, 76 S.Ct. 617, 100 L.Ed. 676, 1956 AMC 742 (1956)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Hanioti (defendant) owned the passenger ship City of Athens and advertised it as a common carrier for passengers for hire. A group of passengers (the passengers) (plaintiffs) booked passage with Hanioti on the City of Athens for a voyage from the United States to Europe. The voyage was canceled, and Hanioti failed to refund any of the money the passengers had paid for the voyage. The passengers sued Hanioti under admiralty law, alleging that Hanioti had breached their contract and also that Hanioti had defrauded the passengers and had been unjustly enriched by keeping the passage money for his own use. The district court held that this action fell within admiralty jurisdiction because the claim arose from a maritime contract. The court of appeals reversed the decision, holding that the claim did not fall under admiralty law because it dealt with the additional claims of fraud and unjust enrichment. The passengers appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.