Archer County v. Webb
Supreme Court of Texas
338 S.W.2d 435 (1960)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Dorothy Scarbauer and others obtained by deed an interest in oil and gas royalties on a parcel of land for a term of 15 years “or so long as oil or gas shall be produced from said premises, or any part thereof in commercially paying quantities.” The deed provided that if the lands were not producing oil or gas after 15 years, the conveyance would expire. The initial conveyor was Margaret Shannon. The conveyance occurred in 1929. When Shannon died, the parcel of land passed by will to C.R. Webb and others (defendants), as trustees of Shannon’s estate. In 1940, the defendants leased oil and gas rights on the property to R.G. Carr, who assigned the lease to Phillips Petroleum Company (Phillips) and Fred Turner. The lease had a ten-year term, but could be extended by either production or by payment of a shut-in royalty. Specifically, the lease stated that upon the payment of the shut-in royalty, gas will be considered produced “within the meaning of paragraph 2 hereof.” In the years that Phillips and Turner’s well did not produce, they paid the shut-in royalties to the defendants. Meanwhile, after the 15-year term in the original deed expired, Archer County and others (plaintiffs), as trustees for Scarbauer, brought suit, seeking a declaratory judgment that Scarbauer’s royalty interest was still in effect on account of the shut-in royalty payments made under the subsequent lease. The trial court held that the Phillips lease and related shut-in royalty payments extended the term of Scarbauer’s royalty interest. The Texas Court of Civil Appeals reversed. The plaintiffs appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hickman, C.J.)
Dissent (Hamilton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.