Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

2011 WL 855936 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2011 WL 855936 (2011)

  • Written by Tanya Munson, JD

Facts

ADM Rice, Inc. (ADM Rice) was a subsidiary of Archer Daniels Midland Co. (ADM) that purchased and exported rice and wheat. ADM Rice sold large amounts of rice and wheat to Iraq through the Grain Board of Iraq (GBI). ADM Rice agreed to post a performance bond that guaranteed the quality of rice or wheat. GBI accepted an offer from ADM Rice for 120,000 metric tons of rice for a price of roughly $69 million. ADM arranged for a performance bond through the Trade Bank of Iraq (TBI) for $6.9 million, 10 percent of the contract price. ADM also applied for a letter of credit in the lump sum of the same amount from JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Chase) (defendant). Chase issued the letter of credit with ADM Rice as the account holder and TBI as the beneficiary. The letter of credit incorporated the terms of the performance bond, including the requirement that all claims made must be accompanied by a laboratory report from the international quality inspection company SGS. ADM Rice shipped the rice to Iraq, and the rice was certified by SGS before leaving the United States. The rice was inspected by SGS in Fujairah, U.A.E., and once again when it arrived in Umm Qasr, Iraq. All SGS inspection reports indicated the rice was in good condition. The rice was completely discharged after the SGS inspection in Umm Qasr on February 14, 2011, and the final SGS inspection report was issued the following day. However, on February 10, 2011, Chase received notice from TBI stating that it received a claim from GBI because an SGS laboratory report certified problems with the quality of the rice, and thus TBI sought to draw down the entire amount of the letter of credit. Chase notified ADM and conveyed that it intended to honor TBI’s request because it complied with the letter of credit. ADM Rice contacted Chase and asserted the demand was wrongful because there was no adverse SGS report. ADM Rice contacted various offices of SGS to confirm there was no such report. ADM brought suit seeking a preliminary injunction to enjoin Chase from paying TBI.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rakoff, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership