Archuleta v. Gomez
Colorado Supreme Court
200 P.3d 333 (2009)
- Written by Curtis Parvin, JD
Facts
Ralph (Lupe) Archuleta (plaintiff) and Theodore Gomez (defendant) owned adjoining properties in the Upper Huerfano River drainage of the Arkansas River Basin as successors-in-interest to Sabino Archuleta. Portions of various irrigation ditches ran through Lupe’s and Gomez’s properties. Lupe sought an injunction from the water court to force Gomez to restore three ditch rights-of-way to reestablish Lupe’s access to water through the ditches. Gomez contended that he had acquired the rights by adverse possession because more than 18 years prior, Gomez had filled in one of the ditches and diverted all of the water from another ditch, and the third ditch had ceased flowing onto Lupe’s land in 1968. Gomez also participated in rotational agricultural irrigation agreements using the ditches that did not involve Lupe, and Lupe had not participated in ditch maintenance. Gomez contended that because Lupe had not exercised his irrigation water right for over 18 years, Gomez owned the water right by virtue of Gomez’s actions adverse to Lupe. The water court agreed, awarding all disputed water rights to Gomez. Lupe appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hobbs, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.