Argentinis v. Gould
Supreme Court of Connecticut
592 A.2d 378 (1991)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Paul L. Gould, Inc. (Gould) (defendant) contracted to build a house for P.A. Takis and Ourania Argentinis (Argentinis) (plaintiffs). As part of the final agreement, Argentinis executed a mortgage note, under which he would pay $43,000 of the purchase price. After Argentinis moved in to the house, he noticed that some of the construction was incomplete and that there were numerous defects in what was constructed. Argentinis brought suit for breach of contract. Gould countersued to foreclose the mortgage, claiming that Argentinis had defaulted by not paying. The trial court found in favor of Argentinis in both actions and awarded Argentinis $73,068.75, which was the cost of repairing the construction defects. The superior court and the appellate court affirmed. Gould appealed, arguing among other things, that the damages awarded to Argentinis should have been reduced by $43,000, the amount of the mortgage.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Glass, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.