Arizona v. Bass
Arizona Supreme Court
12 P.3d 796 (2000)
![SC](https://quimbee-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/educator/photo/11/Sean_Carroll.webp)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Stephanie Bass (defendant) was charged with various crimes related to a car accident. The state (plaintiff) alleged that Bass was driving recklessly and that this recklessness caused the accident. The trial court permitted Meg Farrell, who was in the other car, to testify over Bass’s objections about statements allegedly made by three unidentified bystanders. The bystanders were not involved in the crash but had come to the scene of the accident after it happened. According to Farrell, the bystanders stated that Bass had been speeding when she had passed them earlier on the road and that Bass had been weaving in and out of traffic. Farrell testified that the bystanders did not see the crash. The bystanders left the scene before investigators were able to question them. Bass was convicted, and she appealed, arguing that the statements of the bystanders were inadmissible hearsay.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)
Dissent (Martone, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.