From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Arizona v. Gant
United States Supreme Court
556 U.S. 332 (2009)
Gant (defendant) was arrested for driving with a suspended license shortly after getting out of his car. He was handcuffed and then put in the back of a police car. With Gant secured in the police car, officers proceeded to search the passenger compartment of his vehicle and found a gun and cocaine. Gant was charged with possession of a narcotic drug and drug paraphernalia. At a preliminary hearing, Gant moved to suppress the drug evidence because he felt that the decision in New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981), did not allow police to search his vehicle after he was secured in the police car, since he posed no threat to the officers and he was arrested for an offense for which no evidence could be found in his car. At trial, his motion to suppress was denied and he was convicted. The Supreme Court of Arizona, however, upheld the motion, claiming the search violated the Fourth Amendment. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Concurrence (Scalia, J.)
Dissent (Breyer, J.)
Dissent (Alito, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 517,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.