Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy
United States Supreme Court
548 U.S. 291, 126 S. Ct. 2455, 165 L. Ed. 2d 526 (2006)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) allowed parents to sue their local schoolboards to acquire certain educational accommodations for disabled children. IDEA also allowed courts to award prevailing parents “reasonable attorney’s fees as part of the costs” of bringing the action. Prior to passage of IDEA, a conference report was issued, clarifying that the language “reasonable attorney’s fees as part of the costs” included educational testing and reimbursement of expert fees. The conference report was unopposed, but the final version of IDEA did not incorporate this clarifying language. Pearl and Theodore Murphy (plaintiffs) won an IDEA lawsuit against the Arlington Central School District Board of Education (defendant) on behalf of their son, Joseph. The Murphys then sought an award of fees for the services of Marilyn Arons, an educational expert who had guided them through their lawsuit. The district court awarded $8,500 for Arons’s services, and the court of appeals affirmed the award. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Alito, J.)
Concurrence (Ginsburg, J.)
Dissent (Breyer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.