Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda)
International Court of Justice
2006 I.C.J. No. 126
The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (plaintiff) brought suit in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) against Rwanda (defendant) on the ground that Rwanda allegedly was involved in and supported a variety of military activities in the DRC’s territory. The DRC sought to establish jurisdiction of the ICJ on the ground that nine treaties existed between the two countries containing jurisdictional clauses which required submission of disputes to the ICJ. Two of these treaties were dismissed at the outset as Rwanda was not actually a party to one of them, and because the DRC did not pursue any claims involving the second treaty. On the other seven treaties, Rwanda objected to their enforcement on the grounds that it had either entered reservations regarding their dispute settlement clause, or that the treaty provisions in question did not apply to the actual matters in dispute. The DRC denied the validity of Rwanda’s reservations and attempted to argue that the dispute fell within the terms of the treaties. In evaluating whether it had jurisdiction, the ICJ considered jurisdictional clauses present in the Genocide Convention and the Convention on Discrimination against Women.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 711,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 711,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.