Armindo v. Padlocker, Inc.

209 F.3d 1319 (2000)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
A
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Armindo v. Padlocker, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
209 F.3d 1319 (2000)

  • Written by Noah Lewis, JD

Facts

Carine Armindo (plaintiff) was an entry-level clerical employee at Padlocker, Inc. (defendant) for less than three months when she was fired for excessive absences. Armindo was pregnant at the time, but she had not been employed long enough to be protected by the Family and Medical Leave Act. Moreover, Padlocker’s sick days accrued only after three months of employment. Armindo missed at least six days of work, five times due to pregnancy-related illnesses and once because of car trouble. Nine other times, Armindo arrived late or left early, some of which was pregnancy related. Armindo brought a Title VII claim alleging pregnancy discrimination. The district court assumed that Armindo had established a prima facie case of pregnancy discrimination, but it issued summary judgment for Padlocker on the basis that Armindo failed to establish that her poor attendance record was a pretext for unlawful pregnancy discrimination. Armindo appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Civil Rights

Key Terms