Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Armory Park Neighborhood Association v. Episcopal Community Services in Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court
712 P.2d 914 (1985)


Facts

The Episcopal Community Services in Arizona (ECS) (defendant) opened St. Martin’s Center (the Center), the purpose of which was to provide one free meal per day to local indigent individuals. The Center was located adjacent to a residential neighborhood known as the Armory Park Historical Residential District. The Armory Park Neighborhood Association (the APNA), an entity devoted to improving, maintaining, and insuring the quality of the neighborhood filed a public nuisance suit against ECS seeking to enjoin the Center from continuing its free food distribution program. The APNA alleged that neighborhood residents had sustained injuries from the Center’s patrons who also frequently trespassed onto residents’ yards, sometimes urinating, drinking, or littering. As a result, the number of arrests in the area increased dramatically. The trial court granted the APNA’s request for a preliminary injunction enjoining the Center’s from continuing the program and denied ECS’ motion to dismiss the complaint. ECS appealed. The court of appeals reversed, concluding that a criminal violation was a prerequisite to a finding of public nuisance. The Arizona Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Feldman, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.