Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center
United States Supreme Court
135 S.Ct. 1378 (2015)
Under the Medicaid Act, states received federal funds so long as they met certain requirements, including that they set medical rates that were “consistent with efficiency, economy, and quality of care” and “were sufficient to enlist enough providers” so that sufficient care and services were available in a state. The sole remedy against a state’s failure to meet the act’s requirements was the federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) withholding Medicaid funding. In Idaho, the state Department of Health and Welfare (DHW) (defendant) administered Medicaid. Exceptional Child Care (Exceptional) and other medical service providers (plaintiffs) sued DHW in the United States District Court for the District of Idaho, claiming that Idaho’s medical rates were lower than what the act required. The district court granted Exceptional summary judgment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Concurrence (Breyer, J.)
Dissent (Sotomayor, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.