Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Armstrong v. Mayor

979 A.2d 98 (2009)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,800+ case briefs...

Armstrong v. Mayor

Maryland Supreme Court

979 A.2d 98 (2009)

Facts

Cresmont Properties Ltd. received construction and occupancy permits for a parcel of land in Baltimore City. Cresmont sought to build a residential complex with 26 four-bedroom suites, and the permits were for 26 dwelling units. The Baltimore City Zoning Code defined “dwelling unit” as a building occupied by a family. The code defined “family,” among other things, as “a group of not more than four people, who need not be related by blood, marriage, or adoption, living together as a single housekeeping unit in a dwelling unit.” The code does not define “single housekeeping unit.” Cresmont planned to lease each bedroom in each suite separately, under one-year lease terms. Under the leases, the tenants would share the common areas in the suites. The Baltimore City Department of Housing and Community Development (defendant) granted Cresmont’s permits. A group of neighborhood residents opposed to Cresmont’s development of the property (plaintiffs) appealed the issuance of the permits, arguing that the complex constituted 104 individual “rooming units,” not 26 dwelling units. The board affirmed the issuance of the permits, finding that the four tenants in each suite together constituted a single housekeeping unit, and thus, under the code, a family. The circuit court and the court of special appeals affirmed. The Maryland Supreme Court granted the plaintiffs’ petition for certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Harrell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 620,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 620,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 620,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership