United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
625 F.2d 433 (1980)
The federal district court entered default judgment against McAlpin (defendant) in a suit prosecuted by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The court appointed Armstrong (plaintiff) as receiver for the companies involved in the litigation, and the SEC gave Armstrong its case files. Armstrong hired the Gordon Hurwitz law firm to serve as counsel to the receiver. During the course of litigation, Altman, a lawyer who had supervised various SEC cases, including the case against McAlpin, joined the Gordon Hurwitz firm. Even though Altman had not been directly involved in the SEC suit against McAlpin, Gordon Hurwitz sequestered Altman from engaging in its representation of Armstrong. Nonetheless, after Armstrong began proceedings to recover assets of the concerned companies, McAlpin and other defendants moved to disqualify the Gordon Hurwitz firm entirely. The district court denied the disqualification motion, and McAlpin appealed. A panel decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the district court decision. Armstrong petitioned for en banc review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Feinberg, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.