Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Arres v. IMI Cornelius Remcor, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
333 F.3d 812 (7th Cir. 2003)


Facts

In 1996, IMI Cornelius Remcor, Inc. (Remcor) (defendant) hired Janice Arres (plaintiff) as a human-resources administrator. In March 1999, the Social Security Administration (SSA) advised Remcor that 10 percent of Remcor’s employees had entered social-security numbers on their W-2 forms that were inconsistent with federal records. Arres, believing these employees to be aliens who lacked authorization to work in the United States, recommended that Remcor fire the employees. Remcor instead sought legal advice from the SSA and an attorney, ultimately deciding to ask the employees to review their W-2 forms and correct any errors. Arres believed that Remcor’s course of action was unlawful and refused to process any information provided by the employees in response to Remcor’s request. Remcor thereafter fired Arres. Arres sued Remcor, alleging that Remcor had fired her in retaliation for her refusal, and claiming that her discharge was in violation of Illinois law. The district court granted summary judgment to Remcor, and Arres appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Easterbrook, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.